Ground the Plan in the Repository
Inspect the actual modules, conventions, tests, and ownership boundaries that the change will touch.
Ask an agent to map the codebase, identify dependencies and risks, and propose the implementation sequence before a line of production code changes.
Inspect the actual modules, conventions, tests, and ownership boundaries that the change will touch.
Call out assumptions, tradeoffs, migration steps, and risky dependencies while they are still cheap to change.
Review and redirect the proposed sequence before the agent edits files or opens a pull request.
Keep the approved plan, source references, and acceptance criteria attached as implementation begins.
| Capability | Unstoppable | Cursor | Orca | Conductor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deterministic workflows orchestrating Codex and Claude | ||||
| Plugin, skill, & memory sync across providers | ||||
| Multi-repo PR support | ||||
| Free agent usage | ||||
| Remote control and mobile app | ||||
| Team cost and usage dashboard | ||||
| Bring your own subscription | ||||
| macOS and Windows | ||||
| Cloud agents | ||||
| Native chat interface (goodbye, TUI!) |
Comparison as of October 1, 2026, based on each product’s publicly documented capabilities.
You choose the files, workspaces, connected apps, and browser sessions available to the task. Sources and results stay attached so you can review how the agent reached its answer.
Yes. Keep approvals at the steps that need judgment, then let the agent continue with the approved context instead of restarting the task.
Choose whether to allow marketing tracking and session recordings. Essential features, performance monitoring, and first-party attribution stay on. Privacy policy